|
Wednesday, 13 May 2009 08:48 |
|
Written by Dann Anthony Maurno, Editor-in-Chief
“Many Europeans are concerned their privacy could be breached by the growing use of radio frequency identification (RFID) chips,” declared the European Union in a document called “Citizens Summary: Radio frequency ID chips – EU privacy and data protection.” The European Commission and European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) issued three documents, including recommendations; an impact summary; and citizens’ impact summary.
The short of it:
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written By Louis Sirico Earlier this month, SB 362, introduced by Senator Joe Simitian, (D-Palo Alto, CA), was unanimously passed by California lawmakers. The new law, which goes into affect on January 1, 2008, protects a person from being forced to have an 'identification device' subcutaneously implanted. The law defines an “Identification device”as "anything that is passively or actively capable of transmitting personal information, including, but not limited to, devices using radio frequency technology". This is one of the bills I wrote about this past July (found here: Getting Personal to Prevent Banning RFID). After publishing this article, and contacting the offices of Senator Simitian, Senator Ellen Corbett (D-San Leandro, CA), and California Governor Schwarzenegger , the bill was amended from 'any unique identifier' to 'any unique personal identifier' as per our recommendation. I consider the passing of the bill to be a huge victory. Everyone I have spoken to in our community agrees that no one should be forced to have a tag implanted under their skin. California is not the first state to do this. Wisconsin passed Act 482, in May 2006, and North Dakota in April, 2007. Colorado and Ohio are reviewing similar bills while Florida and Oklahoma choose not to pass what their lawmakers proposed.  Photo courtesy of VeriChip Corp | Given that, all the new laws still allow people to choose to have an RFID tag implanted. The Attorney General of Mexico and 18 members of his staff choose to implant a Verichip (see image left), an FDA approved 12-millimeter, glass-covered RFID tag, in the fatty tissue of their upper arm. The primary purposes are stated 'as verification when entering high security areas' and 'faster access to medical records'. These guys aren't the only ones. Verichip reports over 2,000 people have been tagged. As Orwellian as this sounds, I wrote about this being done at Barcelona beach club back in November of 2004. The patrons volunteered to put RFID under their skin simply to prevent needing to carry their wallet around in their bathing suit. Click here to read the entire article. Personally, I prefer to use a wrist-band tag and live with the tan lines - but that's my choice. | However, the right to choose is something one group wants to take away from you. The anti-RFID group, CASPIAN, attacks |
|
Read more...
|
|
Two-thirds of all bills introduced in state legislatures are filed at the request of state or local government agencies, business associations, social activist groups, companies, or individual citizens. Most of those are brought to the legislature by legislative advocates, or lobbyists.
|
|
Read more...
|
Written By Louis Sirico
Here in California, there are five bills being considered that govern the use RFID technology. Four bills were introduced by Senator Joe Simitian, (D-Palo Alto, CA), and one was introduced by Senator Ellen Corbett (D-San Leandro, CA). I have been in contact with Senator Simitian’s office regarding these bills. The Senators and supporters of the bills, such as the ACLU, are concerned about privacy. Every member of the RFID Wizards community I’ve spoken to also shares these concerns but passionately believes RFID technology can be implemented in a way that protects peoples’ privacy.
After thoroughly reviewing the bills, it appears that ONE WORD is all that stands between balanced legislation and unnecessary outlawing. That word is "personal", and that's what the laws need to be.
For our readers that are not familiar with the bills, let me provide some background. (Please note: you can click on the title of the bill to read the actual text.)
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|